Jump to content
NEW - Download our iLRN2023 Springer Proceedings here! ×
EXTENDED DEADLINE - Feb 29: Academic and iLEAD submissions in the secound submission round for iLRN2024! ×
  • Academic Stream

    Proposals

    All Academic Stream submissions will be published and should be submitted as scientific papers. There are two publication formats, depending on the submitted paper type:

    1) Academic Stream Submissions: Refereed Scholarly Papers Published in Conference Proceedings indexed in Scopus Database

    • Full paper (12 to 15 pages in Springer LNCS format, incl. references) for oral presentation.
    • Short paper (8 to 11 pages in Springer LNCS format, incl. references) for oral presentation.

    2) Academic Stream Submissions: Refereed Scholarly Papers Published in iLRN Conference Proceedings (not indexed)

    • Work-in-progress paper (4 to 7 pages in iLRN Proceedings format, incl. references) for poster presentation. WIP papers describe early-stage research with their theoretical background, methodology, and, if applicable, first data collections.
    • Doctoral colloquium paper (4 to 7 pages in iLRN Proceedings format, incl. references) for oral presentation in the doctoral colloquium. Both doctoral level as well as master’s by research students/candidates are eligible to submit to the DC. The DC will be held as a session in addition to the regular paper sessions, with students presenting their research to each other (in English).

     

    Review criteria

    Contribution to Immersive Learning Research
    How much does the submission contribute to research on learning, instruction, teaching or education with immersive technologies?

    Originality and Innovation
    How original and innovative is this contribution? How novel and unique are the proposed approach, methods, or ideas?

    Methodological/theoretical rigor
    Depending on the type of contribution (empirical or theoretical): How sound is the research methodology or theoretical contribution of this submission? For empirical work: are the experimental design, data collection, and analysis appropriate and well-executed? For theoretical work: are theoretical conclusions logically structured and coherent?

    Claims/Conclusions
    How valid, significant and appropriate are the claims and/or conclusion the authors make? Do they interpret and discuss the implications of their empirical results/theoretical conclusions and (if applicable) the limitations of their work?

    Language and academic writing style
    Is the text error free (spelling, syntax, grammar)? Is the text comprehensible to the academic community?

    Anchored in relevant literature
    How well is the paper anchored in relevant immersive learning research literature? Does it provide appropriate citation of related work in the field?

    Compliance with style/formatting and referencing guidelines
    Does the paper comply with the Springer LNCS template and guidelines (https://www.springer.com/gp/computer-science/lncs/conference-proceedings-guidelines/)?

×
×
  • Create New...